Newsweek and Time Weigh In on Christianity and Heaven (Revised 4/20/2012)

Two articles greeted us over Easter season from Newsweek and Time magazine respectively.

Andrew Sullivan wrote for Newsweek that he wanted Jesus but not the church (and certainly not the political emphases coming from Christians). Even my son asked me about this piece. We had a nice half hour conversation over the phone about it, since he lives in New York.  

Two articles greeted us over Easter season from Newsweek and Time magazine respectively.

Andrew Sullivan wrote for Newsweek that he wanted Jesus but not the church (and certainly not the political emphases coming from Christians). Even my son asked me about this piece. We had a nice half hour conversation over the phone about it, since he lives in New York.  

Sullivan seems to want a moral Jesus who guides us in terms of the wisdom of life, but not Jesus the Savior, which does seem to be centrally related to the mission Jesus thought he had. In fact, he said he came in part to build a church, a community that was responsive to God and that pursued the mission of God in the world. So we cannot have Jesus without the church. Sullivan may be right to a degree that the church has become too politicized. But the solution is not to in effect secularize the presence of the church and have its desires relegated to the sidelines of societal discussion for a type of individualized morality where the hero is the surgically limited Jesus of the Thomas Jefferson Bible (a figure he appeals to as a example).


Here is the link to a longer response by Mark Galli of Christianity Today:


John Meacham wrote about heaven for Time magazine. The piece had a feel of the need to remake heaven on earth about it (Interestingly, the opposite of Sullivan's direction, I think). The call of heaven should move us toward social justice. There is much in this piece worth considering, but it also risks making vacuous key themes taught by Jesus and the apostles as central to hope and faith, with the additional recognition that if we are left to fix things by our own devices, we may well fail (as our past record shows). A serious touch of the grace of God and our responsiveness to Him is required ot turn the corner on how to find heaven. I include below the response of Mitch Glaser to this piece and leave it for your reflection. It gets at a key point of what happens when we misstate the theological premise as we reflect on what theology needs to do or be.

Here is his letter to the Time editor:

Letter to the editor Time Magazine 


Response to: Heaven Can’t Wait 

April 16, 2012 Issue 

I found the article “Heaven Can’t Wait” in the April 16, 2012 edition of TIME Magazine to be both enlightening and disturbing. I am a Messianic Jew (a Jew who believes Jesus is the Messiah) and a 60-year-old male who lives in New York City. I reflect both the Jewish and Christian communities’ views on Heaven, as well as those of my generation. 


I also lead Chosen People Ministries, an organization founded in 1894, which has been reaching out to the Jewish and Christian communities with the message of a Jewish Gospel for more than a century. This gives me a unique perspective on heaven and hell, the nature of the Gospel, the balance between good works and good deeds, and the Christian and Jewish hope for the future kingdom. 

I appreciated Jon Meacham’s insights (perhaps more for their cultural rather than theological value) but was shocked by his misunderstandings about the early Christians – all of whom were Jewish, up to a point. 


He writes, “The story of Jesus as interpreted by Paul and as told in the Gospels created a unique understanding of salvation and life after death. No one in first-century Judaism had been looking for a human atoning sacrifice.” (p. 33). Unfortunately, Meacham makes a mountain out of this theological molehill and builds his misunderstanding of the Christian hope upon his under-researched and inaccurate idea. 


Inter-Testamental literature and early rabbinic writings indicate that a substantial group within first-century Judaism believed in the coming of a suffering and even atoning Messiah. 

A key passage demonstrating this is Isaiah chapters 52 through 53, which is alluded to by Jesus, quoted in the book of Acts in the early sermons of Peter, and affirmed by Paul in his classic statement on the Gospel found in 1 Corinthians 15:1-3, which Meacham quotes at the end of his article. 

Isaiah chapter 53 describes a suffering individual, identified by the prophet as the Servant whose “mission” in life was to die in the place of sinful Israel and the Gentile nations (Isaiah 53:4-6). The prophet clearly describes the atoning death of this individual in verse 8, “He was cut off out of the land of the living for the transgression of my people, to whom the stroke was due.” 

The author of “Heaven Can’t Wait” appears to downplay the issue of personal salvation and presents a view of salvation focusing on “heaven coming to earth,” bringing a more corporate version of redemption focused on righting the wrongs and evils of our present day. This implies that the work of Christians today should focus on changing society as a means of preparing for the age to come. 

The view of heaven Meacham espouses ignores the hope for a suffering Messiah that is the bedrock of faith for Messianic Jews and all types of Christians. He ignores tomes of scholarship, including the new book entitled The Gospel According to Isaiah 53 (available here), recently published by Kregel Publications and edited by myself and Dr. Darrell Bock, who teaches New Testament at Dallas Theological Seminary – one of the world’s foremost evangelical seminaries. I also teach at the Talbot School of Theology, a part of Biola University, and Meacham quotes form Dr. Erik Thoennes of the same institution. 


The Gospel According to Isaiah 53 highlights the views of leading evangelical scholars who believe that Jesus, from His own words in the Gospels to those of other New Testament writers, is clearly understood as the fulfillment of Isaiah 53. Jesus is the Suffering Servant who died a substitutionary atoning death for our sins. 


The Apostle Paul, also a Messianic Jew, summarizes the Gospel in 1 Corinthians 15:1-3, claiming that Jesus died for our sins and rose again from the dead, according to the Old Testament Scriptures. Unless one believes that the words of Paul and even the words of Jesus were penned centuries later (which is another discussion), then clearly many first-century Jews did believe that a human atoning sacrifice was expected… especially by those Jews who believed in Jesus and wrote the New Testament! 


Meacham quotes the end of 1 Corinthians 15, but should consider that the hope of heaven and admonition to remain “steadfast, unmovable, always abounding in the work of the Lord” would be impossible without the foundational truth of Messiah’s death and resurrection, providing personal salvation for both Jews and Gentiles and ultimately the redemption of a world cursed by sin. 

I am glad the author and TIME Magazine tackled such an important topic. However, I believe that the article should have taken a much broader look at the variety of views on heaven. Meacham’s work reads far more like an editorial than a well-researched article, which is how it seems to have been presented. 

From Dr. Mitch Glaser 

President, Chosen People Ministries 




  • Avatar

    David Moles

    Should not “weight” be “weigh” in title

    Typos bug me in scholarly blogs. I think the term in the title should be "weigh" not "weight".